Posts Tagged ‘web’

Internet Browsers: Should they all look the same?

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009 by Rachel Kneen

Here in the 4Ps Marketing office there is a lot of discussion about different web browsers and their various pros and cons. Everyone has their personal favourite, of a little poll the top three in here were Chrome, Firefox and Internet Explorer with a few people using all three plus others! On a wider scale Net Applications’ (a web metrics company) June 2009 figures have shown interesting trends, Internet Explorer still has the majority share of 65.5% followed by Firefox with 22.5% of the market, Safari 8.25% with Chrome, Opera and Netscape making up the rest.

I was however intrigued when I stumbled across an article mentioning recent research carried out by Philip Lenssen at Google Blogoscoped, he discusses the slightly changed layouts of the Google results pages. The main observation is that the size of the Google logo on the SERPs is different depending which browser you are using. Some say it’s sharper, some say it’s due to standardisation and others just cannot see what all the fuss is about.

I had a quick look and did notice that there are differences, but if it is a step towards standardisation is it a good thing? Surely the differences make up the reasons why everyone has a different preference?

Bing, the picture so far…

Friday, June 12th, 2009 by Matthew Phelan

So, we all waited with baited breath for the launch of Bing and what it would mean for the world of search engines. The preliminary results provided by Robin Goad of Hitwise Intelligence indicate that since the launch date when traffic peaked, it significantly declined. However, this did not come as so much of a surprise as many of us would expect that the novelty of the new experience would soon wear off. However, extraordinarily Road Goad reports that the average time spent on the site was 8.5minutes.

Whilst some people observe that there is little difference between the "New Decision Engine" Bing and search engine Google there is one difference which seems minor to the everyday user – the related searches appear on the left hand side in Bing whilst Google puts them at the bottom of the search page. User Centric conducted an in-depth eye-tracking experiment and came back with "…sponsored links attracted a greater amount of users’ attention in search results returned in Bing than in Google – 42 per cent versus 25 per cent per search. "

Thus Bing may be great for advertisers and online businesses but will that be enough of an advantage if there are not enough visitors to the site?

Google recommends we test the speed of our websites

Friday, June 5th, 2009 by Hannah Miller

Who says loading speed of a website is important?

Google has written on its webmasters blog recommending that all webmasters should download the Firefox add on "Page Speed".

Page Speed can be installed as an extension of the "add on" Firebug on Firefox. It is a powerful tool which measures the speed of your website.

 

Why should I check my website loading speed?

 

As search engines are becoming more competitive, rankings are becoming even harder to achieve. Google has to research and implement new parameters to stay ahead of the game.

Google is the "search engine giant" and if they are even considering using loading times to assess website ranking then I’m listening so why shouldn’t you?

 

Why would it effect rankings?

 

Surely it must be difficult for Google to find new ways to filter out spammy websites. However using different algorithms to filter results can improve SERP’s and keep Google users happy.

Therefore it may become a ranking factor – if your website loading time is higher than the average your positions could descend.

However what if a website is graphically intense? Obviously the page loading time is longer, but that doesn’t mean the page is spam.

Could it mean lengthy loading times could cause websites to disappear from rankings??

 

Search Engine Optimisation Strategies; Transactional VS Branding

Monday, January 19th, 2009 by Matthew Phelan

Search Engine Optimisation Strategies; Transactional VS Branding

Search engine optimisation or SEO is a broad topic; there are many ways to gain high organic search engine rankings in Google and other major search engines. However, not all these tactics are the same; there are some differences in strategy, depending on the route a company chooses. SEO is a part of search engine marketing (or SEM) and is used by a variety of businesses throughout the world.
SEO Strategies

Transactional search engine strategies are ideal for selling directly from the search engines. An e-commerce website or sales based company, using this strategy, would aim to be listed in search engine results for keywords that are related to the products or services they sell.

Branding search engine optimisation is a strategy that involves targeting keywords in order to associate a brand with popular search terms. For example, the aim for a company in fashion – who might not necessarily be selling a product – would be to target keywords that related to the fashion industry in order to associate the company brand with those terms.
The Advantages of Transactional SEO Results

There are many advantages to transactional search engine strategies and the main focus is, of course, the ability to sell directly from the search engines. Transactional results are those that have been acquired by a user searching for a specific product or service.

An ecommerce website would greatly benefit from this type of SEO and it is usually the most common route taken by young ecommerce companies. The advantages of this form of SEO are numerous, but the overruling gain is that a user will be searching for exactly what the company is offering. Therefore the traffic from the search engines is extremely targeted, which we all know means more sales.
The Advantages of Branding SEO Results

Again, there are several advantages to brand search engine strategies and the one that usually takes precedence is that having your brand name listed in Google, or any other search engine’s results will achieve great exposure for your company.

This form of SEO is usually used by companies who are not selling a product or service directly and is likely to be popular with companies who want to be related with certain news topics or subject matters. For example, a company who is focusing on creating a greener environment won’t be selling product, but would want to be related to that search term in search engine results.
The reality

The reality is the strategy you use will be self selected by the services you offer. If you offer high end consultancy services to blue chip companies then you will take a branded approach. If you sell large numbers of small items through an e-commerce website you will use a transactional strategy. If you are a large retail brand selling online you are likely to use both.

The key is planning your SEO strategy within the wider SEM strategy and in turn within the wider marketing strategy. Understanding the differences between transactional and branding strategies is essential when assessing the ROI of any SEM strategy.

Author: 4Ps Marketing London

Software giant Microsoft

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008 by Matthew Phelan

Software giant Microsoft has confirmed that it will reopen acquisition talks with Yahoo!, but only after the search engine company re-elects its board.

Following a week of discussions with shareholder Carl Icahn, Microsoft has released a statement on their website expressing the desire to resume talks with the failing search engine provider to acquire either their "search" function or the entire company. However, discussion will only go ahead after Yahoo! has elected a new board of Directors.

Talks of the potential takeover have been active since the 31 January, as well as the opening of last year, but have previously been unsuccessful. Microsoft added "we have never been able to reach an agreement in a timely way on acceptable terms with the current management and Board of Directors at Yahoo!. We have concluded that we cannot reach an agreement with them."

Despite the past failures, Microsoft has stated that they will welcome further discussion with Mr Icahn when a new board is in place. The firm insist that they will respect the right of Yahoo! shareholders to "determine the destiny of their company", and subsequently do not intend to comment on the issues before the shareholder meeting.

Microsoft believe that the acquisition will deliver "superior value to Yahoo!’s shareholders and the marketplace as a whole", and previously insisted this when Yahoo! announced an agreement with search engine Google last month.

Both Microsoft and Mr Icahn agree that to discuss details of price at this stage would be premature, but Microsoft maintain that they will welcome talks if a new board is elected at Yahoo!’s shareholder meeting.